First, candidates for elected office within each Sector would likely have education, work experience, and interest in the Sector they wish to represent. It is impossible for any candidate to have 30 years of education and full-time work experience in all thirty Sectors of government. There is simply too much knowledge for any one person to know. People can only work and learn one fulltime job at once. |
If you worked in the prison industry for 30 years, you did not put in 30 years as a welfare caseworker, overseeing a foreign embassy, serving on the police force, litigating labor law, or 30 years studying EPA regulations. America currently has the same people making laws regarding banking, labor-law, family law, healthcare, and space exploration. Not one congressman could have possibly worked 30 years in each of these very different disciplines. |
Second, under this Haley2024 reform, when campaigning, the candidates would put out a full policy position on just their Sector’s issues. Currently, it is rare to find even a slight mention on a candidate's website of policies in over half the thirty Sectors in which a congressman would be responsible. Separating government authorities allows voters to concentrate on their opinions regarding just one Sector of power in each of the thirty Sectors. |
Currently, a voter might like a candidate’s military policy, but not the candidate's road policy. A candidate’s healthcare policy might be problematic, yet their education policy is sound. Currently, a voter must select one candidate with their full array of policy positions. Under this reform, the voter can choose candidates per Sector that match the voter’s positions as much as possible |
Third, under this reform, the elected leaders would have the time to thoroughly dig into every piece of legislation. These leaders would not be spread too thin, just giving one day per major Sector of government authority every other month. Currently, most congressmen spend half their time fundraising and campaigning; they do not have the time to fully understand the majority of the bills in which they are voting. |
Judges, lawyers, and businessmen analyze every word, every comma, and every clause to try to determine the intent of the legislature. If the judge called congressmen to testify without preparation to find out their intention of a provision; 90% of the congressmen would have no clue. This does not demonstrate stupidity, just ignorance that is unavoidable due to the immense number of regulations, laws, and programs. Talking points and briefs of legislation are often very misleading. It takes decades of experience in the area of law in question to know the ramifications of the changes in laws. A person with 30 years of experience knows why most fences were put up and will not tear them down with ignorance. |
One drawback of this reform is obviously having thirty times more elections. Without a doubt, this is a big concern. Other Haley2024 reforms would mitigate this problem such as the Rating Systems and changing how we pick our representatives. However, standing on its own, one could see political parties and other trusted organizations vouching for candidates. |
Another significant drawback is thirty times the number of politicians having more time to mess things up by doing more legislation. The Haley2024 reform of moving to a 70% representative vote to make legislation could curb this concern. The Haley2024 reform of switching to CRA’s only governing its members also mitigates this concern. |