Haley2024 the Movement

  • Haley2024
    • Home
    • FaceBook Pages 1-10 >
      • Competitive School Boards
      • End Welfare: Transition to Competitive Charity
      • Competitive Governance
      • Competitive Representative Agencies
      • 70% Democracy
      • Competitive Police
      • Competitive Military
      • Competitive Social Security
      • From Government to Societal Oversight
      • Competitive Roads
    • Facebook Pages 11-20 >
      • Competitive Currencies
      • Pockets of Freedom
      • Competitive Rating System
      • Competitive Prisons
      • Competitive HealthCare Systems
      • Competitive Family Law
      • Separate Government Authority into 30 Sectors
  • THE CORE
    • All Reforms In Constitutional Form >
      • Constitutional Amendment Creating the CRA Structure
    • Competitive Regulatory Agencies >
      • CRA Structure
      • The 30 Sectors >
        • The Food Sector
        • The Manufacturing Sector
        • The Human Resources and Sales Sector
        • The Identity Sector: Personal and Business
        • The Environmental Sector
        • The Work Safety and Disability Sector
        • The Media and Communications Sector
        • The Land and Water Sector
      • CRA Bullet Points
      • CRA: The Need for a New System
      • Media for CRAs
    • The Rating System >
      • Rating Structure
    • Welfare to Charity >
      • The Charity System
      • The Charity Structure
      • The Charty Sector
      • The Charitable Distribution Association - CDA Sector
      • The Charity Assessor Organization - AO Sector
      • The Family Law Sector
      • The Religious Sector
      • Media for Charity
    • Education >
      • Education Structure
      • Colleges
      • The Public School System Is Unconstitutional
      • Education articles and Videos
    • Structure of the Foreign Policy and Private Military >
      • The Diplomatic Foreign Policy - DFP Sector
      • The Commander in Chief - CIC Sector
      • The Military Corporations Sector
      • The Military Capabilities System MCS Sector
      • The Military Authorization Agency - MAA Sector
    • Social Security and Medicare >
      • The Insurance Sector
    • Roads / Transportation >
      • Media on Road
  • Others
    • Monetary Policy >
      • Financial Sectors 18 and 19
      • Monetary Policy Structure
      • Monetary Policy Media
    • Health Care >
      • Heath Care Media
    • Fighting Federal Control >
      • Governor's Repeal
      • The Supreme Court
      • A New Court System
      • Changing the Head of the Inspectors General
    • Haleynomics >
      • Educational Media and Books
      • Laffer Curve
    • Statism organizations
    • A Citizens Responsibility
  • More
    • Violent Crime Mitigation System >
      • The Violent Crime (VC) Sector
      • Police >
        • Police Structure
      • Law Enforcement Authorization (LEA)
      • The Judicial Authorities Sector
      • Prison and Corrections
    • Corporate Proxy Groups
    • Haley2024 taxes >
      • Taxes
    • Debt
    • Foreign Policy: Pockets of Freedom
  • Blogs
    • Blog on Welfare to Charity
    • Blog on Haleynomics
    • Blog on Monetary Policy
    • Blog on Haley2024 the Movement
    • Blog on issues of the day
    • Blog on Education
    • Blog on Competitive Regulatory Agencies
    • Blog on Health Care
    • Blog on Ratings
    • Blog on EPA
    • Blog on Roads
    • Blog on Pockets of Freedom
    • Blog on Social Security
    • Blog on Military
    • Blog Statism Organizations
    • Blog on Social Issues
  • About the Movement
    • About Bill
    • MY STUDY
    • Social Media
  • Donate
    • Volunteer!

Health insurance being tied to employment causes many problems

11/19/2015

 
 Health insurance being tied to employment causes many problems.  Car insurance is a much better model.  If an employer decides they want to get rid of the health insurance benefit and just add the amount in your compensation package or have a designated amount they are willing to apply towards a premium or a health care saving account, that would be far better. 
Picture
Picture
At this point, every person would buy an individual or family health insurance plan.  Many people cite a lower cost ‘group plan’ as a reason to keep employers involved.  Lower cost group plans are a myth.  Insurance companies are by definition very large groups.  The employer versus individual tax benefit disparity would need to be fixed.  Haley2024 tax reforms suggest eliminating all deductions and lowering tax rates.​
The current problems are numerous and mostly derive from government regulations.

The first problem is that companies need to pay out more for insurance policies for married couples or employees with children.  Pay is not based on the ‘needs’ of the employee, rather the worth of their work to the company.  This disparity can influence hiring decisions, thus discrimination. 
Picture
Picture
Second, family plans are complicated by two wage earning parents.  Which employer should pay?  Should the family be broken up into two plans?  Which plan should the children go on?  The regulations surrounding these issues cause many problems and create incentives/ disincentives that are often negative.
Third, should the insurance be tied to employment?  When you pick a job, you also select your insurance plan; this is not good free enterprise.  What if you like a particular job, however not the insurance plan, should that influence your job choices?  For many, it is a significant factor!  You may want high deductibles and low premiums, yet the company offers the opposite with low deductibles, and the employee portion of the premium is high.  

Picture
Picture
Some insurance plans do not include some doctors or hospitals.  Some give preferences to certain providers.  Some insurance plans include procedures that others do not.  Some have whole medical sectors covered, and others uncovered.  All insurance plans are not the same, and people have preferences.  

Fourth, health insurance is mostly one-year plans.  This is greatly influenced by government regulations.  Life insurance very often has guaranteed renewal for a certain number of years because of the nature of the insurance.  If you come down with a deadly disease or an accident significantly limits your life expectancy in November, you want that insurance the following year.
Picture
Picture
That is a real value to policyholders and wholly inadequate insurance if the insurance company can cancel just because it is a new year.  It is government regulations that create one-year policies that are the most significant contributor to the preexisting condition problem.  In the free enterprise system, life, as well as health insurance, would naturally have more value as long-term insurance plans.       
Stuck in a Job
Fifth, once an employee or their family member has an expensive medical condition that would be considered a preexisting condition to the next employer/ insurance company, that employee is stuck in that job.  If switching a job means changing health insurance, and a particular condition is not covered, an employee feels stuck in their job, thus inhibiting advancements in their career. 
Picture
Picture
Unemployable 
Sixth, when an applicant to a job has to staple their potential health care liability to their application because that company is self-insured or otherwise harmed when, a person with high health care cost is hired.  That person is significantly hampered in seeking employment.  This is still true, even if it becomes illegal to discriminate based on this factor.
A Little History
Health care insurance started to be supplied by employers because of government price control of labor in the 1930s.  As always, when the government creates price controls, people adjust other things to compensate.  Prices will be adjusted, you just have to look at many effects to see the compensation.  In this case, the government froze wages and companies trying to attract better talent offered health benefits.  
Picture
Picture
Picture
Money is very tight for employers and just because politicians state that they need to provide certain items for their employees, does not mean they have the money.  From the attached story on Obama Care, look at a common practice from employers of government mandates that just shift compensation plans.   
 His current employer was contributing five dollars per hour to his 401(K) plan. Because Obamacare forced the employer to pay higher premiums for insurance for employees (with some of the coverage unnecessary), the employer can now contribute only fifty cents per hour to our client’s 401(K) plan.
Picture

Comments are closed.
Please spread the word of these new government reforms.  Share this website with friends in emails and please link or share on social media. ​ Haley2024 the Movement

Contact

All Social Media Sites
This Haley2024 website is strictly non-profit: Educational on public policy. 
Contact: [email protected] or  [email protected]
​
Text 757-408-8255
This searches only www.Haley2024.org
Picture