Haley2024 the Movement

  • Haley2024
    • Home
    • FaceBook Pages 1-10 >
      • Competitive School Boards
      • End Welfare: Transition to Competitive Charity
      • Competitive Governance
      • Competitive Representative Agencies
      • 70% Democracy
      • Competitive Police
      • Competitive Military
      • Competitive Social Security
      • From Government to Societal Oversight
      • Competitive Roads
    • Facebook Pages 11-20 >
      • Competitive Currencies
      • Pockets of Freedom
      • Competitive Rating System
      • Competitive Prisons
      • Competitive HealthCare Systems
      • Competitive Family Law
      • Separate Government Authority into 30 Sectors
  • THE CORE
    • All Reforms In Constitutional Form >
      • Constitutional Amendment Creating the CRA Structure
    • Competitive Regulatory Agencies >
      • CRA Structure
      • The 30 Sectors >
        • The Food Sector
        • The Manufacturing Sector
        • The Human Resources and Sales Sector
        • The Identity Sector: Personal and Business
        • The Environmental Sector
        • The Work Safety and Disability Sector
        • The Media and Communications Sector
        • The Land and Water Sector
      • CRA Bullet Points
      • CRA: The Need for a New System
      • Media for CRAs
    • The Rating System >
      • Rating Structure
    • Welfare to Charity >
      • The Charity System
      • The Charity Structure
      • The Charty Sector
      • The Charitable Distribution Association - CDA Sector
      • The Charity Assessor Organization - AO Sector
      • The Family Law Sector
      • The Religious Sector
      • Media for Charity
    • Education >
      • Education Structure
      • Colleges
      • The Public School System Is Unconstitutional
      • Education articles and Videos
    • Structure of the Foreign Policy and Private Military >
      • The Diplomatic Foreign Policy - DFP Sector
      • The Commander in Chief - CIC Sector
      • The Military Corporations Sector
      • The Military Capabilities System MCS Sector
      • The Military Authorization Agency - MAA Sector
    • Social Security and Medicare >
      • The Insurance Sector
    • Roads / Transportation >
      • Media on Road
  • Others
    • Monetary Policy >
      • Financial Sectors 18 and 19
      • Monetary Policy Structure
      • Monetary Policy Media
    • Health Care >
      • Heath Care Media
    • Fighting Federal Control >
      • Governor's Repeal
      • The Supreme Court
      • A New Court System
      • Changing the Head of the Inspectors General
    • Haleynomics >
      • Educational Media and Books
      • Laffer Curve
    • Statism organizations
    • A Citizens Responsibility
  • More
    • Violent Crime Mitigation System >
      • The Violent Crime (VC) Sector
      • Police >
        • Police Structure
      • Law Enforcement Authorization (LEA)
      • The Judicial Authorities Sector
      • Prison and Corrections
    • Corporate Proxy Groups
    • Haley2024 taxes >
      • Taxes
    • Debt
    • Foreign Policy: Pockets of Freedom
  • Blogs
    • Blog on Welfare to Charity
    • Blog on Haleynomics
    • Blog on Monetary Policy
    • Blog on Haley2024 the Movement
    • Blog on issues of the day
    • Blog on Education
    • Blog on Competitive Regulatory Agencies
    • Blog on Health Care
    • Blog on Ratings
    • Blog on EPA
    • Blog on Roads
    • Blog on Pockets of Freedom
    • Blog on Social Security
    • Blog on Military
    • Blog Statism Organizations
    • Blog on Social Issues
  • About the Movement
    • About Bill
    • MY STUDY
    • Social Media
  • Donate
    • Volunteer!

If Government Was In Charge of Food Similar to Education

1/4/2015

 
The government has progressively gained control over education and at higher levels of government.  Parental rights have slowly, but now very severely been compromised.  Similar to a frog in a pot of water and the heat turned up.  The frog is boiled before it realizes the water is too hot.  

To endeavor to show people the high levels of control, compare food to education.  What if the food supplied was similar to education?

​

Picture
Picture
  Government taxes for food would rise very high and hidden throughout dozens of taxes, thus reducing economic activity. The government will then offer to fund your grocery bill if they control everything you ate.  If you wanted to choose the food you ate, you would be given the option.  However, all government funding would be forfeited. In the government food system, if you had religious objections or preference to eating certain types of food, you could not be accommodated. ​
Government control has always proven to be more expensive so the price would be significantly higher.  The innovation in food production and farming would drop.  Politicians would put in place price controls to rein in high food price inflation and would result in higher prices.  Food shortages and long lines at stores have proved to be the standard in other experiments in socialized food.  Farmers and processors would be government jobs, and politicians always try to increase jobs.   ​
Picture
Picture
If you wanted to shop at another government food provider, you would have to move where you lived to another food district.  The government would try to give people a feeling of control by allowing everyone to elect their food board, the board elected to collect all the food liberties, and rights from all the people enrolled and then to exercise that control.  Everyone would live under the board's control whether or not you voted for them.
The food board would campaign on more vegetables or fruits, some would be vegetarians, while others would champion fast and junk food.  Whoever wins would control the food for all within that city that wish to get the benefit of their tax dollars back in the form of food.  If you wanted higher quality of food then you are offered, you would have to give up all funding.  If you could provide for your food needs at a less of an expense then the overpriced public sector, you would not have the option of being exempt from the tax and providing for yourself. 
Picture
Picture
Food advocacy groups would become much stronger because people would contribute a lot of money to try to influence who was elected and their food policy, to attempt to get their preferences.  Many liberals would find local control not as good as state and state not as good as national control.  Advocacy groups would lobby hard for everyone in the nation to eat the way they wish.  They would claim that people are not competent to choose for themselves and attempt to force everyone currently outside the public food system to be forced by law to enroll.       
After a certain time of being ‘cooked’ by the high heat of control of the government, people will forget about the benefits of free enterprise food and claim that food is just too important for ‘competition’ and how most people would starve if the government did not provide.  

Picture
Picture
Picture
About 3 weeks after posting this article, Don Boudreaux posted this to Café Hayek.  In no way am I implying he copied my idea; just that great men think alike (I state humbly).  Don is a great economics professor that I learn a lot from on his appearances on ‘ECON Talk’ and on this Café Hayek blog. 

If Groceries Were Supplied Like K-12 Education…by Don Boudreaux on January 23, 2015

in Education

… news reports would regularly include stories of “grocery experts” offering new and “pioneering” proposals to improve grocery distribution, and of the citizens of “grocery districts” meeting with their local “grocery boards” to discuss and debate these different proposals.  Each affiliate of a major national network (like each of the national networks), as well as each newspaper and other significant news outlet, would have its own “grocery reporter” (or “grocery correspondent”) to keep tabs on the latest efforts to improve the way government delivers groceries to citizens.

When new big-city mayors are sworn into office they would typically replace the incumbent “Grocery Superintendents” (or “Grocery Chancellors”) with their own preferred “Grocery Superintendents” (or “Chancellors”).  The local policy punditry would discuss in great detail the differences in the grocery-supply philosophies of the new Grocery Superintendents compared to those of the outgoing Superintendents.  ”Grocery-beat reporters” would often solicit from people on the street these people’s opinions of the different methods proposed to improve grocery distribution.  Questions such as “Do you think new Grocery Chancellor Smith’s proposal to allow a handful of people to buy their groceries from charter grocery stores is a good idea?  Or do you side with former Chancellor Jones in staunchly opposing charter grocery stores?” would be asked and seriously answered.

Ordinary men and women – physicians, electricians, cab drivers, auto mechanics, professors of economics, web designers, kennel owners, carpenters – almost none of whom have the slightest bit of expertise or experience to qualify them to assess the different methods proposed to deliver groceries, would nevertheless be expected to have such an opinion, and they would be applauded if and when they attend the next meeting of the “Grocery Board” to express their opinions on how best to supply groceries.

When some new method of supplying groceries is chosen, many people will await with great hope and joy the coming improvement in grocery supply – and such people will always suffer disappointment when (as would nearly always be the case) the expected improvement in grocery supply doesn’t materialize.  ”Professors of Groceries” in all the top “Schools of Groceries” across the land would debate with each other and with the public the whys and why-nots of the failure of the latest scheme to make America again #1 in international measures of grocery distribution.  Newspapers of record would regularly feature headline reports on the “grocery crisis.”

Anyone proposing to get government out of the grocery-supply business would, of course, be ridiculed as being totally unrealistic or being an out-of-touch ideologue, or accused of harboring a secret desire to see the the vast majority of people starve while only the top one percent of the population continues to enjoy excellent access to superb groceries.  Likewise, proposals to cut (or to not increase) grocery-district funding would be widely condemned as being pro-starvation proposals.  And efforts to measure the performance of grocery-store workers would be mocked as impossible as well as unfair to such workers.  Efforts to restrain the pay of grocery-store workers would be portrayed as efforts to deny ordinary citizens access to the best possible supply of groceries.

Ordinary citizens would, in short, be expected to ponder appropriate grocery budgeting as well as alternative grocery theories, and to have informed opinions on all grocery-supply matters – for, in the finest democratic tradition, these citizens, as voters, would be responsible for superintending the supply of groceries.

Be Sociable, Share!
buy backlinks link
8/1/2015 10:27:47 pm

What's a backlink? What's the difference between backlinks, inbound links, and incoming links? Learn more about backlinking from the SEO experts!

www.essaykings.me link
9/9/2015 09:24:32 am

Have problems in producing essay? Try out brand new custom creating service. Just simply you can shell out quite a few dollars and acquire fantastic essay from a professional

au essay services link
12/17/2015 10:29:14 pm

Education can be easier with a help of professionals!

Stock Option Tips link
5/6/2016 12:44:37 am

You are good services provider. We also best stock and commodity market recommendations in India.


Comments are closed.
Please spread the word of these new government reforms.  Share this website with friends in emails and please link or share on social media. ​ Haley2024 the Movement

Contact

All Social Media Sites
This Haley2024 website is strictly non-profit: Educational on public policy. 
Contact: [email protected] or  [email protected]
​
Text 757-408-8255
This searches only www.Haley2024.org
Picture